Talk:Commission for Protection against Discrimination

CorenSearchBot error
The bot's [ edit] is error. The information is about official public institution. Such information cannot be copyrighted. -Stalik (talk) 10:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * That is incorrect, information about public institutions certainly can be copyrighted and there's no indication that it isn't in this case. Copyright exists automatically unless explicitly disclaimed. I have removed the offending content from this article, you should not readd it.  Hut 8.5  21:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * This is ridiculous. Explanation of the functions and competencies of a public institution cannot be copyrighted. How can words and phrases like "equality body" or Paris Principles or "legally binding decisions" or "compulsory administrative measures" be copyrighted and if they are - HOW to explain what this institution is actually for!? --Stalik (talk) 12:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)