Talk:Common Dead

Article moved as title was misleading
I've explored the sources provided on this article and checked for further reliable sources around the web. I discovered that Common Dead is in actuality a pseudonym or performing name of one Andrew P. Laurenson or A.P. Laurenson as currently found online. This individual has moved towards publishing work under their natural name, and relevant citation was included on the article to show these findings.

As per the rules for Moving a page this page is appropriately moved as per the below statutes:
 * The title does not follow Wikipedia's naming conventions, such as that it is not the common name of the subject or it is overprecise.
 * The subject of the article has changed its name and the new name has come into majority use.

Thus the article was moved as it would otherwise be outdated and potentially misleading. As per the above, actual subject name is an "Andrew P Laurenson" or shorthanded as "A.P. Laurenson" based on more recent activity and publications.

Thus it should be non-controversial change and remain without reversion. Article redirect should be in working order. Metlurg (talk) 21:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Name change and sources
please discuss here and gain consensus before changing anything else and especially moving. The sources provided even in the ridiculous lackluster "updates" do not support this being renamed, much less all the promotional content. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Harping on the "page move" issues appears to be a distraction at this point. I don't care what you name the artist's page, and my edits don't impact this. More alarmingly, are your spiteful and needless revisions to base content that is fully sourced and illuminating the article. Your actions demonstrate that you have literally not read or acknowledged the article contents used for citation. Otherwise, anyone can see their relevancy and enhancement to the article's quality. Power tripping, at its finest. Metlurg (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I was asked to look at this dispute. Regardless of where the page ends up, or its content, it is now time to discuss; I have fully-protected the page until such time as a consensus can be reached. Please note that if there is no substantial commenting here after a period of time, you are welcome to ask for a third opinion. Primefac (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * How am I power tripping when I literally have no power? You've failed to provide sources that identify the name change in any significant manner. Please provide them and I'll gladly request the move myself. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, not a hill I want to die on. I've let go the issue of name change/page move on a skeletal level. The meat of the article, if you will, contained valid edits highlighting who is behind this so-called "band" and my investigative work was initially explained on this talk page.
 * I'll gladly inform the article of any findings, since now it's become such a highlighted issue. In the meantime, we should find truce over the fact that certain body edits were valid in describing the nature of the subject for what it is: one guy with a fake name, to put it crudely.
 * Please remember to indent properly. ;) Metlurg (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * My indentation is fine, and literally in line. However, you've not provided reliable sources. PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You're techncially right, I haven't... because they were there when I showed up. I read and pulled existing information.
 * Googling from there, found his name more recently with self-titled work and some evidence of screen work that post-date Common Dead. Just look at the dates. If those latter sources are lacking in prestige, I get it, but that's not the whole picture.
 * At the end of the day, I identified a categorization and misrepresentation issue, and attempted to correct in good faith. Metlurg (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * These all specifically discuss Common Dead, not Laurenson. PICKLEDICAE🥒 01:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand you. My interpretation is that Common Dead is Larenson. I point to The Chain Gang of 1974 as an example. Should the article not follow this construct? Again, I'm simply going by interpretation of the facts as I found them here. Metlurg (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The page move was a bad idea for starters. Pickledicae is correct in underscoring the "subject" in terms of identity....Andrew Laurenson may be the single player but that does not change the fact all citation is categorically published for "Common Dead" as the subject, not Laurenson. and it certainly seems obvious that he acted alone (cannot find a single image or source of a full band) and by that virtue alone it should be obvious to be one person. So Chain Gang is a good example to give credit to Metlurg. Article should stay as it was (title Common Dead) but the intro clarified to name Laurenson as the artist of the project since it should not be a article about him as a person . Kats2501 (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Your last part is literally all I was maintaining in my more recent replies, if you would take a look at the whole thread. Again, I don't care enough to argue more on a page move. I already concede this. I just didn't think talking about Common Dead was different than talking about the sole individual responsible, but whatever, at this point. Metlurg (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Googling from there, found his name more recently with self-titled work and some evidence of screen work that post-date Common Dead. Just look at the dates. If those latter sources are lacking in prestige, I get it, but that's not the whole picture.
 * At the end of the day, I identified a categorization and misrepresentation issue, and attempted to correct in good faith. Metlurg (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * These all specifically discuss Common Dead, not Laurenson. PICKLEDICAE🥒 01:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand you. My interpretation is that Common Dead is Larenson. I point to The Chain Gang of 1974 as an example. Should the article not follow this construct? Again, I'm simply going by interpretation of the facts as I found them here. Metlurg (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The page move was a bad idea for starters. Pickledicae is correct in underscoring the "subject" in terms of identity....Andrew Laurenson may be the single player but that does not change the fact all citation is categorically published for "Common Dead" as the subject, not Laurenson. and it certainly seems obvious that he acted alone (cannot find a single image or source of a full band) and by that virtue alone it should be obvious to be one person. So Chain Gang is a good example to give credit to Metlurg. Article should stay as it was (title Common Dead) but the intro clarified to name Laurenson as the artist of the project since it should not be a article about him as a person . Kats2501 (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Your last part is literally all I was maintaining in my more recent replies, if you would take a look at the whole thread. Again, I don't care enough to argue more on a page move. I already concede this. I just didn't think talking about Common Dead was different than talking about the sole individual responsible, but whatever, at this point. Metlurg (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)