Talk:Communication quotient

Brand and Product Line - is this appropriate for Wikipedia?
Hi guys, I just thought I should start a talk page regarding the Communication Quotient page. I'm not sure that the content added under 'Brand and Product Line' is appropriate for Wikipedia as it seems to read to me like a sales pitch and the only sources are from one website run by that company. The article to date has been examining the use of Communication Quotient, where it has been used and how it has been defined. The term 'CQ' seems to have been used in many different ways and the content added under 'Brand and Product Line' seems to follow this path rather than dealing directly with the Communication Quotient. I think it would be ok to reference this company's approach to the Communication Quotient as a definition under the 'Definition' section.

Singairverve (talk) 02:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

As discussed above I have removed the section 'Brand and Product Line' as it did not seem appropriate for a Wikipedia entry, nor was it in keeping with the rest of the article. I have added a reference to the company that added this under 'Definition' giving their definition of what CQ is in line with how other companies and academics define it and how they have been referenced in the article.

Singairverve (talk) 02:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Link Rot
I have gone through and fixed all of the hyperlinks and put in proper citations. Singairverve (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)