Talk:Communist Party of Sweden (1995)

Untitled
"Shortly thereafter, the entire KU district in Gävleborg joined APK."?

- No, it didn´t! My parents (for example) continued to be leading figures in KU also after the split.--194.71.24.5 10:05, 15 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Ok, but didn't the district change affiliation en bloc? which doesn't necessarily mean that all individuals in the district joined APK. --Soman 14:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

No, there was rather some individuals THAT DID LEFT. The en bloc stayed.--83.226.184.147 17:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Why (1995)?
Why is that part of the article name? It doesn't seem very fitting. Obviously, some distinction has to be made to differentiate it from the other Communist parties of Sweden, existing and former, but "(1995)" doesn't feel right. Jobjörn 21:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It goes in line with how other parties with identical names are differentiated. 1995 is the year the party was legally refounded with the name SKP. --Soman 09:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Split article
Should this article be split? (and a separte formed for APK) APK and SKP are the same essentially in every aspect except for the legal, but perhaps it would be easier to describe the historical development of APK in a separate article (and the events leading up to its formation). --Soman 15:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Holodomor denial
Iw ould be worth mentioning somewhere in the article that the party engages in Holodomor denial. http://www.skp.se/levande_historia/ukraina.htm --Dorpater (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)