Talk:Company (2002 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 14:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * This is a gangster film as opposed to being just a crime film.
 * "tension arises" — Should be "tensions arise"
 * "after a meeting with a man named Haneef" — Can be rephrased as "after meeting a man named Haneef"
 * "Malik and Chandu kill Saeed and his brother Anis in the rear seat of a car." — Elaborate on who Saeed is to let readers know why Malik and Chandu killed him and Anis.
 * "His rival gang leader and colleague under Aslam's umbrella Sharma, who was in a meeting with police inspector Rathod, is killed." — Who is Aslam and who was the cast member who played him? If he's not that important, remove him from the sentence altogether.
 * Wikilink Home Minister.
 * "Haneef was shot dead a few months after Varma met him" — Did it impact the film in anyway? If not, it seems unnecessary and can be removed.
 * "He later met several crime reporters, police officers and associates of gangsters" — Regarding the film? if so, state that in the sentence.
 * What did Varma mean by "profound-sounding"?
 * Of course, wikilink the references on the first instance of them being mentioned.

That's about it from me. Resolve these comments, and the article will be promoted. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * All done. Thanks for the review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments,. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 04:08, 4 May 2019 (UTC)