Talk:Comparative contextual analysis

This PROD is unbelievable, and the extensive PROD rationale is downright misleading, as it purports to have searched high and low for sources, to no avail. Gscholar returns 72 hits, Gbooks returns 66 hits. How can the PROD nominee have overlooked this?

Info: One of MZMcBride's bots has deleted the page before 05:54, 23 December 2007 MZMcBride (talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Comparative contextual analysis" ‎ (csd g2) Power.corrupts (talk) 19:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The key word there is "significant". In other words, the string "Comparative contextual analysis" occurs, but it does not have the same meaning in the sources it occurs, aside from analysing thing by comparing them, keeping context in mind. It is not like, for example, Subjective expected utility, a legit topic. Abductive (talk) 22:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)