Talk:Comparison of World War I tanks

This is a terrible table. GraemeLeggett 10:32, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Money where mouth is, it is getting better. GraemeLeggett


 * It was an extended labour and painful childbirth... Tank history needs more help, too.   &mdash;Michael Z. 2005-03-21 16:10 Z 

Origin of table
It seems to my eyes that this table was lifted wholeheartedly from the Site given as source. GraemeLeggett


 * I haven't seen the original (just tried to fix up the table), but I believe that raw data are not copyrightable. Unless we've substantially copied some additional creative work by the author; I think this is okay.  &mdash;Michael Z. 2005-03-21 16:08 Z 


 * The layout however poor was someome's work. Its evolving anyhow. GraemeLeggett

Amendments
I've done as many as my head can take for the time being. It needs the Mk II & III. Need to double-check number of m.g. per vehicle. The 24 infantry in the Mk V* was theoretical. The A7V armour wasn't mild steel. Have taken "Date Introduced" to mean "In Action." Not included U.S. M1917, since it wasn't used; probably needs footnote. Saint-Chamond title boxes need combining - the differences were superficial. More to come. Hengistmate (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)