Talk:Comparison of anti-plagiarism software

Possible addition: Earwig's Copyvio Detector
Someone may wish to research and add the following: Earwig's Copyvio Detector. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Comparison of anti-plagiarism software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150425070226/http://etest.vbi.vt.edu/etblast3/ to http://etest.vbi.vt.edu/etblast3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Grammarly
I use Grammarly sometimes, and I'm pretty sure this "list" has got this wrong wrong: Its plagiarism detection service isn't freeware, it's only available for those who buy a Pro subscription or something... --إلياس الجزائريElias 19:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You're totally right. I tried it but it is gave the result saying that there is no duplication, while the text was a copy of an other website.--Support Wikipedia, support free sharing of knowledge 15:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Plagtracker doesn't work
Hi!

I've tried this software but it can't give result. Is it the same for you?--Support Wikipedia, support free sharing of knowledge 15:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BamLifa (talk • contribs)

Urkund
It would be good to create an article for Urkund (https://www.urkund.com), so that it can be included in this table. Urkund has been (relatively) highly rated in independent testing. —DIV (120.18.117.249 (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC))
 * If you think it is notable and you can produce reliable sources, then why don't you do it? -- Alexf(talk) 10:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Good question. Because I do not want to create an account, and when I started on WP, it wasn't possible create a new article without logging in.  It occurs to me now that this might have changed in the meanwhile.... —DIV (120.17.194.221 (talk) 11:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC))
 * Yes, I did have a hazy memory that someone had told me there was a change. Now anyone can create a 'draft' of an article, for approval.  However I have just had a go at the Wizard, and dislike it.
 * Secondly, I'm both busy and lazy.
 * Thirdly, I reckon my time is better spend enhancing others' contributions, rather than adding basic material myself.
 * It's not from a lack of boldness, but thanks for the encouragement :-)
 * —DIV (120.17.194.221 (talk) 11:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC))
 * Oh, and because I don't trust the review process. Too much risk of dedicating my time to create a draft that is subsequently rejected. —DIV (120.17.194.221 (talk) 11:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC))