Talk:Comparison of source-code-hosting facilities

Re-adding CodePlex entry based requirements update
CodePlex updated their project requirements page to say project requirement is compliance with the open source definition. Re-adding entry. -- jwanagel 10:54, 22 Feb 2007 (UTC)

Codeberg.org is missing
See here https://codeberg.org/ 84.140.194.210 (talk) 03:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There is a journal article that proves Codeberg is not in the Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamplevia (talk • contribs)


 * This is a list of facilities that have a prexisting Wikipedia article. See WP:WTAF. - MrOllie (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The article has CodeHaus, Fedora Hosted and Tigris in it, but that isn't what interests me. I got what I want, see my Talk page edits. Admittedly, it's imperfect because the quote uses the word "currently". I did the commit message more to my liking.  Jamplevia (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you bother to read the journal article or did you just look at what I quoted? LOL Jamplevia (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * A Codeberg article is on Wikipedia. Other Cody (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Framasoft
Isn't the Framasoft forge missing? -- Error (talk) 00:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

sourcehut and repo.or.cz are missing
sourcehut and repo.or.cz are missing. Xan2 (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Neither of these have articles of their own. Greenman (talk) 10:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)