Talk:CompassionArt

Article in risk of deletion
Look, the ton of "material" that you've added since I added the prod template has actually made the article worse. Please look at the links that I put on your talk page, and try to really make this an acceptable article, or else we're going to have to go through the deletion process. I really wish you well on this, but you've got to try. Unschool (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've deleted the non-GFDL images, tidied and despammed the text a bit, but this is still borderline, with no independent references. The newspaper articles that are claimed need to be tracked down and linked to the article which otherwise doesn't establish notability jimfbleak (talk) 06:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Concur with all your points. Still, it's aesthetically far superior to what it was yesterday morning. Unschool (talk) 02:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability
References and article text do not give rise to inference of notability of the subject (despite claims of notability for many of its participants). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bongomatic (talk • contribs) 02:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CompassionArt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724021104/http://ecentral.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2009%2F2%2F18%2Fmusic%2F20090218092755&sec=music to http://ecentral.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2009%2F2%2F18%2Fmusic%2F20090218092755&sec=music

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)