Talk:Complex nanomaterials

This article does need some work, but since the author added "More coming soon" on the end, I put up an under-construction tag to give the author time to finish up. Realkyhick 07:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Since the author removed the under-construction tag, here's some things that need to be fixed in this article


 * The word "we" is used several times. First person is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article such as this. It can easily be fixed with a rewrite, but I'm vastly under qualified on this topic, so it is best left to an expert.
 * Along that same line, this article generally reads a bit more like an essay than an encyclopedic article. Also easily fixed by an expert on the topic.
 * An organization called "NNI" is mentioned. Please name this group. "NNI" is fine on subsequent refereneces.
 * There are no source citations at all. These are greatly needed for a topic of this kind.
 * There are no Wikilinks at all. While this article might lend itself to fewer Wikilinks than most articles in general, there's still a good many terms that can be linked, I'm sure.
 * There are no sections. It's all one big chunk of text. It needs to be broken into sections, not just to comply with Wikipedia style, but to make the article more readable.
 * After all of the above are done, the article needs to be categorized.
 * This article has a superb foundation, but it just needs some work to put it into Wikipedia style. I'll help in any way that I can, though the article's topic is way over my head. Realkyhick 21:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

This was almost entirely background information on related topics that are appropriately covered elsewhere. The lack of references and idiosyncratic style meant that it didn't really live up to Wikipedia standards. Since it failed to truly define or elaborate at any length on what "complex nanomaterials" are or how this might differentiate from nanomaterials generally, it would be better off simply redirecting there. --Michael Snow 20:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)