Talk:Compliance (physiology)

Merger
They shouldn't be merged. A bladder has a certain compliance, along with veins etc. Compliance is a unit in itself. 16:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The pulmonary compliance page seems be about the same thing, but is more specific. However, they don't seem large enough to need to be independent articles. --PhiJ (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Put them together, there is no reason for them to be apart! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.65.151 (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree, just put the pulmonary part under another header. Otherwise it's a bit confusing, if you search compliance it looks like there's only stuff on the CVS. -Sophie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.123.36 (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * We merged both into one in the German article, allowing to discuss common concepts in one place only. No complaints about it until now... -- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Ront —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.55.240 (talk) 08:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Is there any need for the paragraph about vulcanization? Explaining the chemical process seems a bit off topic here. 187.62.219.102 (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Numerical estimates?
It would be helpful to give in a couple of cases some actual numerical values. For example - aorta compliance or systemic arterial compliance. What are some typical values for the volume of the entire system, typical pressure and volume changes, and hence finally numerical value for the compliance itself? Since it is a life or death issue, it would be great to have typical values for a healthy system and for a diseased system. Or compliance values for some other organs. Something concrete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.195.23 (talk) 00:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Wanted to add the same comment. Examples of physiological values would be helpful to have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.211.160.162 (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)