Talk:Compliance requirements/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I repaired one dead link and tagged two others for which no archived version could be found using WP:CHECKLINKS ✅
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just two dead links to be addressed. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified.
 * OK, dead links have been removed. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just two dead links to be addressed. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified.
 * OK, dead links have been removed. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)