Talk:Computer Bismarck/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I am beginning a GA review of this article. Please feel free to leave any questions, comments and other reviews below. Thanks a bunch! -- Nomader (Talk) 04:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm always wary of passing something just off the bat, but you've done a very good job with this article– I can find no reason not to pass it. The images need alt text, but it's not a requirement for the article to have it at this stage. I can't check the written sources either, but I'm assuming good faith with the understanding that they accurately reflect what's sourced in the article. Congrats, Guyinblack. -- Nomader (Talk) 07:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I'm always wary of passing something just off the bat, but you've done a very good job with this article– I can find no reason not to pass it. The images need alt text, but it's not a requirement for the article to have it at this stage. I can't check the written sources either, but I'm assuming good faith with the understanding that they accurately reflect what's sourced in the article. Congrats, Guyinblack. -- Nomader (Talk) 07:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm always wary of passing something just off the bat, but you've done a very good job with this article– I can find no reason not to pass it. The images need alt text, but it's not a requirement for the article to have it at this stage. I can't check the written sources either, but I'm assuming good faith with the understanding that they accurately reflect what's sourced in the article. Congrats, Guyinblack. -- Nomader (Talk) 07:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm always wary of passing something just off the bat, but you've done a very good job with this article– I can find no reason not to pass it. The images need alt text, but it's not a requirement for the article to have it at this stage. I can't check the written sources either, but I'm assuming good faith with the understanding that they accurately reflect what's sourced in the article. Congrats, Guyinblack. -- Nomader (Talk) 07:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)