Talk:Computer Sciences Corporation/Archives/2016

Recent edits might have WP:COI and promotional issues
Thanks, for the note in your edit summary. I expect to revisit this article when I have more time, as I still see some issues. One issue, given that you are an ex-employee of CSC, is conflict of interest, which is described in detail at WP:COI. The other is terms like “innovative”, which are sourced to the company’s official website. The company’s site is what’s known as a primary source, and is (perhaps counterintuitively) of little value in verifying information. There’s more detail at WP:VERIFY. Suppose a reader wanted to verify that the company is indeed innovative, and checked the source to find that it is the company itself. You can imagine how this would leave the doubtful reader unsatisfied. In any case, I appreciate your starting a dialogue. If my edits still put us in disagreement, I look forward to continuing the dialogue here on the talk page. Cheers. Willondon (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree the joint venture is one of many CSC s joint venture - does not belong in the intro (see Wikipedia:Introduction). Let's use the talk page.--ChristopheT (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)