Talk:Computer system

Cleanup and expert
This page needs help. Lots of help. --Apyule 13:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * agreed, it is way too short for something so important

question immediately classify the computer into 5 generations

Re: Cleanup and expert
I agree, this article has flaws in even the most basic laws of grammar and, frankly, it isn't much of an article. This article isn't going to be fixed up with any great quality any time soon and I think the best way to clean it up is to have someone proficient with the encyclopedic editing style team up with someone who is an expert on computer hardware to merge it into the Computer article. Charlie .somerville 08:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Bit more clean
I revised it to the point where at least it's readable and understandable. It seems the author(s) of this article wanted to point out that it was possible to make a computer system even larger, and to do that make it incorporated with machinery or other computers. I understand that part, at least, but know that computer systems are not made larger with machinery, but rather just by increasing the basics, and can only control machinery. It's a system, but not a computer system.

Also, computer systems can work together, but it doesn't make a whole computer system. The only way is to get the OS to control all the computers to the point where if one is turned on not even a user can access it, but rather all comps are controlled by only one master computer. That's possible but not practical.

Besides the face lift to this article, I think it should be deleted because the article Computer is almost exactly the same as this one. I guess the only different thing is that it's the talk of a computer as a whole. I have to read more on the computer article to see if it should be deleted or merged. --Bookinvestor 19:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)