Talk:Concentrate and Ask Again/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 04:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria I'd race you to finish respective series if there wasn't such a difference in episode numbers.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Gave the article a copy-edit myself, should be in shape now. It's up to you, though, but I would perhaps link the references to different seasons, such as in " Fringe credit since the season two episode "August"." I'm also not sure about the phrase "fairly positive to mixed reviews". "Mixed to positive" might be better, or even "mixed to fairly positive". I think scaling upwards seems more natural.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * MOS is grand.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * All grand here,
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * Scope is fine here. I'm always interested in seeing information on physical effects but it seems that kind of source hasn't surfaced yet. Be nice if it did some day—Bob Comer does some nice work, especially on some of those old Millennium eps.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutrality is good, article is unbiased.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * History is stable, nothing controversial there.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Sole image used is Commons, and is used appropriately. Wouldn't recommend more as there's a quotebox which also breaks up the text nicely.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This one should be good to go, there weren't enough issues for me to be lazy and pass the buck on them. Well done! GRAPPLE   X  04:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for the review! Your copyedit looked great. I have made the changes you suggested. Production info is always difficult to track down (I wish Fringe had the same written works as The X-Files... maybe some day...). Thanks again,  Ruby  2010/  2013  04:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe if John Noble looked as good as David Duchovny it'd take off better... GRAPPLE   X  04:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This one should be good to go, there weren't enough issues for me to be lazy and pass the buck on them. Well done! GRAPPLE   X  04:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for the review! Your copyedit looked great. I have made the changes you suggested. Production info is always difficult to track down (I wish Fringe had the same written works as The X-Files... maybe some day...). Thanks again,  Ruby  2010/  2013  04:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe if John Noble looked as good as David Duchovny it'd take off better... GRAPPLE   X  04:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)