Talk:Concentric ring model

This article needs a picture of the model

damn copyrighted images!

All right, I am going to redo this page and make it more descriptive. Will take a while though; I do need diagrams. The Fascist 11:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Multiple Entries for this Topic
A search of "Concentric Zone Model" or "Concentric Zone Theory" will direct you to the article "Concentric Zone Model". However, searching "Burgess Model" or "Concentric Ring Theory" brings you to "Concentric Ring Theory". The Zone Model article provides mostly commentary on the model and its history, while the ring model article is an actual explination of the theory. It would be helpful to combind these.

Pictures: We can do better than Paint
To be honest, we really coould do with something better than a few images drawn up on MS Paint. If there are no real images, you could use GIMP, or have a go at drawing one. The ones on the page aren't really Enecylopedia quality...

Dracion 18:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I think we should merge the concentric zone model and the concentric ring model so it is easier for hardcore geographers

Lol, dude... those pictures look like a three year-old drew them. I would be ashamed.

Something needs to be done.
I hate to say it, but something needs to be done about this page.

As as GCSE student who uses wikipedia alot for Coursework, i have to say that this is not of true wiki standard.

I implore someone to do something about it and SOON preferably.

As it would help me greatly with my geography Coursework on proving that there are marked differences between residential areas within an urban area.

Thankyou.

Yours sincerly,

Reverend-GT 16:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Merge
Support they should be merged under concentric ring Nengscoz41620 01:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
No, a merged article need not be deleted. Rather it should be reduced to a redirect. I'll do that now. Jim.henderson (talk) 18:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)