Talk:Concept inventory

The Concept Inventory entry does a poor job of distinguishing a CI from any other large-scale standardized test for which there is a pass-fail threshold. For example, the emphasis on "research" to justify CI distracters is not a distinguishing feature. There is research and systematic development of distractors for all (or nearly all) professionally developed norm referenced tests. Furthermore, a norm-referenced test can have a criterion pass-fail point, using scales that are norm referenced.

It was not my intent to show that the research on distractors distinguishes CIs from other tests. What I tried to do is to show the reader why research on distractors is important. The distractors selected by a student completing a CI ought to shed light on the student's understanding of the concept in question.Iss246 (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Concept inventory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20090907000100/http://prst-per.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v2/i1/e010105 to http://prst-per.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v2/i1/e010105
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110917034304/http://www.evolutionassessment.org/ to http://www.evolutionassessment.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041212202058/http://modeling.la.asu.edu/R%26E/Research.html to http://modeling.la.asu.edu/R%26E/Research.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110310120759/http://www.lifescinventory.edu.au/ to http://www.lifescinventory.edu.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC)