Talk:Conceptual Graphs

It seems to me that Conceptual Graphs is not a proper noun, so the the article title should be uncapitalized. Am I wrong? ike9898 21:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Probably proper
Yes, I am under the impression that Sowa considers this a piece of intellectual property in which he and his consortium and/or standards body have a type of proprietary interest. Jon Awbrey 21:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Over-optimistic claim
"Together with concepts like conceptual schema, [...] and Bayesian inference, conceptual graphs may eventually make it possible to implement intelligent agents for unsupervised learning."

This is a matter of opinion, not fact. It may turn out that the conceptual graphs approach is doomed to failure; no one yet knows.

Speculation like this has no place in a scientific encyclopedia, which should concern itself with established facts.

84.9.80.17 11:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)