Talk:Concordat of 2008

Bias
This article basically does nothing except quote people who criticized the Concordat. NPOV tag added. 194.46.233.146 (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC).

Fixing this stub
As is obvious by reading the page, and has been noted by another editor (vide supra), this page is heavily biased. Therefore, I suggest that it either be deleted and/or written using credible, reliable sources. Fictio-cedit-veritati (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

the references are wrongly marked as Spanish; there is a clear bias in text against the Concordat, and the claimed references are contradictory; eg, the text state that "Some congressmen wanted to change the concordat,[3]", while the pointed reference [3] main headline is "Tarso defends agreement with Vatican and says the project preserves the secular state"

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Concordat of 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091021142939/http://www.observatoriodaimprensa.com.br/artigos.asp?cod=511IMQ009 to http://www.observatoriodaimprensa.com.br/artigos.asp?cod=511IMQ009
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090821211813/http://observatorio.ultimosegundo.ig.com.br/artigos.asp?cod=512JDB002 to http://observatorio.ultimosegundo.ig.com.br/artigos.asp?cod=512JDB002

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)