Talk:Concrete Jungle (supplement)

Marvel RPG supplements
Is it necessary for all Marvel RPG supplements to have a separate article for each of them? I do not believe that each entry on List of Marvel RPG supplements is notable enough to warrant a separate article. The information in these stub articles should instead be merged into the list. Thoughts? Fortdj33 (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I concur. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Several of them have multiple independent reviews noted on them, so I think at least those should be retained. I have verified per RPGNet and RPGGeek that these reviews are valid. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 13:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * How about making two lists? One list being a table (like it is now with basic info) and one extended list with separate chapters that detail every campaign/supplemental. Either both lists in two different articles or even both in one article, maybe only giving very prominent supplementals then its own article (like for example the Gamer's Handbook). -- Weapon X (talk, contribs) [[Image:Flag_of_Germany.svg|25px|Germany]] 00:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)