Talk:Concurrence

opening paragraph
This is vague and confusing due to the use of 'apparent' and 'in theory'. I have no expertise in this field but if in law concurrency needs to be proven, then it is not an apparent need, just a need. If on the other hand the article is referring to some wider theoretical discussion rather than what the law is, it should say so; for example, "Concurrence is the concept that both actus reus and mens rea must occur simultaneously to constitute a crime". Tomcrocker (talk) 10:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concurrence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130830202723/http://www.vathek.com/jcl/ to http://www.vathek.com/jcl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Conclusion of concurrence as an element of crime
Answers please 105.52.124.229 (talk) 01:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)