Talk:Concurring opinion

For the May 2005 deletion debate on this article, see Votes for deletion/Concurring opinion.

Abbreviation should be deleted-- incomplete and unhelpful
where is this abbreviation from? It is not used by law practitioners as far as I know and it does not seem like it should be in the article. That abreviation does not appear in the Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enaduris (talk • contribs) 20:57, 17 May 2007‎

Non-binding nature of a concurring opinion
Shouldn't something be added as to the non-binding nature of concurring opinions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.149.128 (talk) 16:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concurring opinion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207160339/http://frederic-rolin.blogspirit.com/archive/2006/04/18/note-sous-cedh-12-avril-2006-martinie-c-france.html to http://frederic-rolin.blogspirit.com/archive/2006/04/18/note-sous-cedh-12-avril-2006-martinie-c-france.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposal to delete line inserted by someone who clearly doesn't understand what is a concurring opinion
I am proposing to delete the line beginning "Concurring opinions may be held by courts but not expressed..."

Whomever wrote this doesn't understand what is a concurring opinion. A concurring opinion by definition is an overt written expression of the views of a minority of the members of a court who are joining in the majority disposition. If a judge's viewpoints are not expressed, they are merely concurring viewpoints or thoughts, but not a concurring opinion. --Coolcaesar (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)