Talk:Condemned (1929 film)

Proposed move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

no consensus to move this page from Condemned (film) to Condemned, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 03:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC) This should be moved so that Condemned can redirect to Condemnation. The film name is derivative of this legal concept. savidan(talk) (e@) 01:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

This band has absolutely nothing to do with that film, and has been around since 1993, pre-dating the film by many years! The two are not linked at all and no move should be carried out. 167.127.24.25 12:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Is this band not entitled to a Wikipedia article just the same as every other band article on this site? I fail to see how this could be contested. Please explain. Mojowibble 12:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Condemned_%28film%29&action=edit&section=1 Editing Talk:Condemned (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A fantastic page of information about the much appreciated band Condemned. Condemned have ALOT of fans all over the UK who will thoroughly enjoy introducing the band to others by the url "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condemned" 81.99.87.114 12:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Crave81.99.87.114 12:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I fail to see how a redirection page can be more useful than an actual article??? 167.127.24.25 12:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

"This should be moved so that Condemned can redirect to Condemnation. The film name is derivative of this legal concept" Well at the end of the day if it was that important the film creators would have already done so. The way i see it is, a lot of people use wikipedia as a reference guide for many subjects including music. In my opinion i think its a case of first come first served and frankly i am glad it wasn't a redirect becuase then i wouldn't have discovered this fantastic band. 194.46.15.106 12:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: the redirect to Condemnation is far more useful to readers than having the 1929 film article stub there. Beyond that, there are other articles that could also stake a claim on the name (including a TV episode and a contemporary film). --Ckatz chat spy  21:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose move. The word condemned has a number of meanings in English, as well as names of other things besides this film. A redirect to condemnation is much more apropros. Many films using common words as title use (film) after the title for disambiguation. ●DanMS • Talk 23:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - If anything, a dab page, not this. -- Beardo 05:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.