Talk:Cone beam reconstruction

The fourth paragraph of the introduction says nothing as to why two methods exist: why measurements aren't invariant to using one method or the other. Especially troublesome is last sentence therein ("This adds complexity, size and cost to the system, but removes the need to rotate the object."): why would one avoid rotating the object if it's a simpler, smaller and cheaper method?

Ngs111 (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

after reading this article, i still don't know how cone beam data are reconstructed!!!

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cone beam reconstruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224213954/http://www.gendex.com/US/Products/Cone-Beam-3-D-Imaging.aspx to http://www.gendex.com/US/Products/Cone-Beam-3-D-Imaging.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923150138/http://www.jgarantmc.com/ct-services.html to http://www.jgarantmc.com/ct-services.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)