Talk:Confederate Memorial (Romney, West Virginia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Neutralhomer (talk · contribs) 11:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * Good prose, well-written, no copy-vios.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Didn't see any MOS issues.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Sources, citiations, notes and bibliography are all listed clearly.
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * Sources are good, no issues.
 * C. No original research:
 * No OR seen.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Topic dicussed in good detail.
 * B. Focused:
 * Topic remains focused, no unnecessary detail on any one part.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral and unbiased.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * No edit-wars or content disputes.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Images are either of own work or public domain, FURs and copyright status templates are given on each.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Images are relevant and have appropriate captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Good article all around, very well done. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 11:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)