Talk:Confession (Leo Tolstoy)

Untitled
The link didn't work so I changed it Robski 11:46 Sep 20, 2006 (GMT)

"without answers to which life to him is impossible." Do people know how to write? 64.252.167.6 03:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on A Confession. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111221173535/http://www.tolstoy.ru:80/main/index.html to http://www.tolstoy.ru/main/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Opinion
In the "Content" section, the following words appear: "This faith could be interpreted as a Kierkegaardian leap, or a disingenuous compromise, but Tolstoy actually seems to be describing a more Eastern approach to what God is." Is this sentence completely subjective and a mere expression of some Wikipedia editor's own personal opinion?96.248.101.32 (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)De Mikeal Carter

A trivial pursuit?
The first sentence of the article asserts that Tolstoy’s work was "…on the subject of melancholia…." This statement may result in a reader having the notion that the book is about a mere passing subjective mood. As a result, it would be dismissive and would trivialize Tolstoy’s words. On the contrary, Tolstoy’s writing may be a rare, profound, objective insight into the essence of life. Wittgenstein, for one, thought it to be so. The Wikipedia article should not include an evaluation of Tolstoy’s research.96.248.101.32 (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Andre Brown