Talk:Confessions Tour/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Righty-ho, I am reading through now and am making straightforward changes as I go. Please revert any where I inadvertently change the meaning. Queries below. Also, don't automatically do what I suggest - if you think otherwise please say so and we can discuss. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Among the various props present was a $2 million disco ball embellished in $2 million worth of Swarovski crystals - 4 mill total?
 * Yes of course :) Is the structure correct? --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 11:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess it is a little confusing as the two number values are the same. I have been thinking about this a bit. Maybe changing the second bit to - "embellished with a further $2 million worth of Swarovski crystals'' makes it sound moer clear. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Images need WP:ALT text. Gah! that'll teach me to cut and paste better... Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * As per this link, the images already have alternate text. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 10:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - pending outcome of review of key image really. I think it qualifies but best to get it sorted out now. Article required little tweaking - well done. Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:49, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, even Im waiting for that only. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 12:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Grrrr. The image was ultimately deleted, hence no non-free images exist now in the article. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 03:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, done and dusted. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)