Talk:Confessions on a Dance Floor/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Hello all. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. Comments to follow. Gong show  ⊕ 19:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Checklist and analysis

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I corrected several minor grammatical errors, but there was nothing major wrong with these areas.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Overall, the article looks great. It is very comprehensive and interesting, and I did not have to fix much to bring it up to MOS standards. The references are good too. Excellent job to all involved.  Gong show   ⊕ 21:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Overall, the article looks great. It is very comprehensive and interesting, and I did not have to fix much to bring it up to MOS standards. The references are good too. Excellent job to all involved.  Gong show   ⊕ 21:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Overall, the article looks great. It is very comprehensive and interesting, and I did not have to fix much to bring it up to MOS standards. The references are good too. Excellent job to all involved.  Gong show   ⊕ 21:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)