Talk:Confidential (magazine)

Fair use rationale for Image:5701confidential big.jpg
Image:5701confidential big.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Major rewrite
The article needs a major rewrite, removing errors of fact (Liberace, Errol Flynn, Dorothy Dandridge and Maureen O'Hara were only witnesses and not plaintiffs in the California trial. Liberace and Flynn were not called to testify. None of the other lawsuits—from Lizabeth Scott's to O'Hara's—ever went to trial), removing dead links and putting the events of Confidential in chronological order. The account of the 1957 trial is garbled. Revising infobox and added needed cites. Cannibalized material from the article on Robert Harrison, which will be reedited for content unique to this article.

Jamesena (talk) 22:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)