Talk:Connaught Engineering

results
I have compiled the complete results and put them into the page. However, due to size issues, it might be best to include them in a seperate article. What do you think? Cadan ap Tomos (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the table can stay in the article - it's about the same size as the results table in Jordan Grand Prix. A couple of other points:
 * the standard order for the columns for multi-entrant tables like this one is entrant, chassis, engine, tyres, driver - see the second table in Lotus Grand Prix results as an example
 * I don't think the flags are necessary. None of the other constructor results tables have them.
 * DH85868993 (talk) 12:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I will change the order of the columns later. Has the issue on flags been disputed before, as the article requests pictures, and i think it may brighten it up a bit, seeing as it doesn't have many images. Also, shall I split the table into Connaught entries and other entries, as in Lotus Grand Prix results ? Cadan ap Tomos (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it probably should be split into two tables, for consistency with the other constructor results articles. DH85868993 (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Connaught Car Club
When I was a schoolboy I was a member of the Connaught Car Club -- an attempt, as I recall, to raise money to keep the Connaught F1 machines going. Does anyone know anything about this. I have no details anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.130.138 (talk) 10:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)