Talk:Connie Talbot's Holiday Magic/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 06:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I'll be reviewing this article for GA in the next few days. Moisejp (talk) 06:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The references are all reliable sources. I looked at all of the online ones and the info stated in the article checked out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It is satisfactorily broad in its coverage.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Both good and bad reviews included.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit wars. Stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The one image used has a proper fair use rationale.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Rather than bringing up any minor issues here, I made a number of small copy edits to clean them up. There were three dead links, but I replaced one, and the other two didn't seem necessary (see my edit summaries). I am very happy to pass this article. Good job. Moisejp (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)