Talk:Conon (disambiguation)

Links for "red link" saints
All saints here but 1 have NO ARTICLE YET. On 3 July 2016 I've done the work of adding plenty of links to offer SOME info to the WP user, another editor has removed it all twice "by principle". If you want to create pages for the "red link" saints, I suggest you look at the work already done on that day.

I oppose blindly following some abstract WP guidelines. WP is meant to offer quick & useful info, period. While red links are meant as an incentive to creating new pages, offering sources for search terms w/o a WP page of their own on the disamb. page is useful to a) readers BECAUSE there are no pages yet, AND b) helpful to eventual editor at creating the page. 1st create the page, then remove links from the disamb. page. [] ArmindenArminden (talk) 09:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Per WP:DABREF, there are no refs on disambig pages. Disambig pages are not meant to be articles.  This is not some abstract guideline, this MOS page tells exactly what disambig pages are and do.  If there are red links, then it is your job to create articles.  You've now pissed me off for the second time by equating me to being a Nazi.  I'm done talking here.  Bgwhite (talk) 18:25, 4 July 2016 (UTC)