Talk:Consensual response

=
===================

Untitled
Copied from the propsed Merge talk page:

It's been a year and a half since the merge tag was introduced onto the Consensual response page, and this one. I'm in the process of wikifying that page, as part of the wikification drive. The page seems to be about the response of both sides of the body to a stimulus on only one side. They use the eye as the only example, but the effect is not limited to the eye, so I move to NOT merge that page into this one. Since such a long time has elapsed, with no other opinions, and the wikifying task is at hand, I'm going to remove the merge tags and attempt to improve the Consensual response page. Nihola (talk) 16:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

- If it can be shown that this type of response only occurs with eyes, then this page should be deleted, I think, as the term in regards to eyes is already defined in the clinical significance section of Pupillary light reflex, and this page is little more than a definition at this point. We're going to need an expert opinion here. Nihola (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

--- The reasoning provided for the response is entirely wrong. Each retina sends fibers into the optic tracts of both eyes as the photosensitive ganglion cells carry the impulse to the Edinger-Westphal nucleus, where the oculomotor nerve then carries the constrictive impulse to the sphincter pupillae. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.139.104 (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)