Talk:Conservatives for Patients' Rights

Lack of NPOV
The entire article past the introduction reads like an anti-CPR pamphlet. Claims are poorly sourced, and are mostly irrelavent to the article as a whole. This article needs significant rewrites.

Since nobody else seems to be paying attention to this, I will have to begin fixing it myself

--Tallanto (talk) 01:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Good Bones, Needs work
I've added multiple inline tags about unreferenced sources, original research and lack of neutrality. The article in general has a good framework and structure, and much of the material appears to be factual, but lacking references. The biggest defect is possibly the use of "weasel words" like "some suspect". The phrase "Most health policy analysts would disagree with Scott's assertion..." may be true, but the linked article only quotes SOME people.

The article in places reads like a promotion of President Obama's plan. Accusations of the truth or falsity of CPR's statements or ads should include specific links to neutral facts that refute those claims instead of statements of their falsity. Similarly, statements about the wishes of President Obama or the will of the American public should include facts to support them. Those statements are original research, not encyclopedic.

Much of the article could easily be improved by linking strategically to articles such as Health care reform in the United States. There are also articles on websites like Factcheck.org that use research to dispute these claims. Be careful of references from "Health Care for America Now". That group is an advocacy organization, so much of the information on their website is not neutral. Find citations to neutral news sources wherever possible.

After clean-up, this article would make an excellent inclusion in the template Template:Health care reform in the United States. AlanK (talk) 19:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Badly written section moved to talk
"Fox News is the most unreliable news network in the history of news media."

"One CPR tactic against the President's plan is to protest at town hall meetings on the issue in as ignorant and uneducated a fashion as possible"

in 4 years on wikipedia, this is probably the worst section of any article I have ever read.

Ikip (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Does this organization still exist?
I can't find anything current (i.e., within the last few years) that even mentions the existence of this group. The last mention of it I can find in any news articles is from 2011 or so. Their website is dead, someone else grabbed the domain name and has a placeholder there. Does anyone know if this organization still exists? Shelbystripes (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Conservatives for Patients' Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090325220140/http://www.cprights.org:80/plans.php? to http://www.cprights.org/plans.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Conservatives for Patients' Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090326083052/http://www.cprights.org:80/? to http://www.cprights.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conservatives for Patients' Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090712003924/http://healthcareforamericanow.org/site/content/new_tv_ad_exposes_health_reform_critics_shady_past to http://healthcareforamericanow.org/site/content/new_tv_ad_exposes_health_reform_critics_shady_past

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)