Talk:Conspiracy (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

Untitled
The summary is very long, and I think it might go into too much detail. Also, much of it is written in what seems to me too informal a style. I was wondering if anyone else shared these opinions. -Branddobbe 18:42, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)


 * I completely agree James 18:47, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

I replaced the summary with the significantly shorter version found at |Memory-Alpha. It is GFDL, despite the Creative Commons license on the site, because it was derived from the Wikipedia article in the first place. I think it is still too long for Wikipedia, but is certainly an improvement. James 19:33, July 28, 2005 (UTC)


 * Memory Alpha's text belongs to MEMORY ALPHA, putting theirs or ANYONE OTHER sites text here is a COPYRIGHT VIOLATION! I have returned this to it's original state, so please leave it alone. Cyberia23 02:02, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Is it just me
Is it just me or at about 27.30min into the ep when Picard and Riker are speaking after the Admiral left in the corridor there is a slightly balding man in a skirt and shin high boots working at a station behind them? Wolfmankurd 17:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

YES! I noticed the same balding man in the skirt, and had to rewind it and note the time. Why?? --Orthogonalogy 19:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * That may have been a "Skant" uniform. But being as this section is "Is it just me"  I'd like to have my own "is it just me" question.
 * Is it just me or is this episode of Star Trek remarkably like "Night of the Creeps"? Angelsilhouette (talk) 04:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dexter Remmick.jpg
Image:Dexter Remmick.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The Creature
I just finished watching this episode. What is the creature and what is it forshadowing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.162.11 (talk) 00:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Note
""Conspiracy" is one of only two episodes in the show's history to be broadcast with a warning about its content." This really shouldn't be there without saying which is the other episode... 70.29.161.7 (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Paul Newman's face?
The article asserts that Remmick's exploding head was modeled after Paul Newman! Is there a source for this, and/or explanation as to why him and not the actor who played Remmick? --Heath 50.134.34.221 (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weird as it seem, but by using Google Books snippets function to preview that page, it does seem to be an accurate paraphrasing of the book. As for the explanation: special effects are expensive so all kinds of strange things get reused eventually. -- 109.78.211.177 (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Long plot
The Plot section is currently over 800 words, but the MOS:TVPLOT guidelines recommend no more than 400 words. (At over 800 words it is too long even for a double episode or feature film plot WP:FILMPLOT.) The version of the plot section that passed the Good article review was also in excess of 500 words. Please try to keep the plot section under 400 words if it has not yet been fixed or has bloated back up past the recommended length again. -- 109.78.211.177 (talk) 04:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)