Talk:Constance Cumbey

Stuff moved
The material that was here has been moved to Talk:Javier Solana. David Cannon 10:34, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

On April 16, 2005 this page was nominated for deletion. The result of the debate was to keep. See Votes for deletion/Constance E. Cumbey for discussion. Mackensen (talk) 15:25, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I think the article should be called Constance Cumbey which is a redirect so would need an admin to do it. What do others think? --SqueakBox 19:11, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

I have reverted the removal of Cumbey's published works, which I consider to be unjustified. Articles about authors frequently list their works. BTW, I agree that the article should be redirected to remove the middle initial. I'll do it now. David Cannon 00:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

In your revert you attempted to humiliate me by giving my contribs in your edit summary. I have removed the duplication of Cumbey's works as unnecessary and the speculation about a new book and about her being User:Cumbey as unsourced and therefore unencyclopedic. Davidcannon falsely accused me of being Cumbey's sockpuppet, for which he apologised to me but not to Cumbey, --SqueakBox 16:37, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Good god, we're voting to keep conspiracy tards' vanity pages now? --Sparks Light


 * SparksLight, if you are a coincidence theorist, you, my friend, are the tard.

Programming
To the subject of the article: no offence, but you sound like you could use a major deprogramming. This is all End Times programming triggering and will aid the New World Order rather than hurt it.

Leave her a message at http://cumbey.blogspot.com/ SqueakBox 18:15, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

To whom it may concern
Constance, you've really got to stop editing this article. It makes you look bad, you know. And you don't hide it well - using the term inter alia is a dead giveaway, for instance, and who else would know about your father's cousin? But more importantly, your edits aren't good Wikipedia. An article is not a debate; criticism doesn't get a rebuttal. Especially when the rebuttal consists of little more than "but Cumbey said they were wrong." Eaglizard 05:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * How is "inter alia" a dead giveaway of anything other than someone being a college grad—currently ~34% of American adults—of the punctilious ilk, who suffered through 4 years of APA and MLA formatting style, et cetera, and never quite kicked the habit? JohndanR (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constance Cumbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927103851/http://www.thebyteshow.com/ConstanceCumbey.html to http://www.thebyteshow.com/ConstanceCumbey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)