Talk:Constantine Dalassenos (duke of Antioch)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

i'LL start this in the next few days. Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * made some tweaks here Otherwise, looks good.  auntieruth (talk) 14:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks . As always, improved by having your fresh pair of eyes look over it. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Lead and text don't agree. Did Zoe not marry him because he was haughty, or did the nobles sink theidea?  auntieruth (talk) 14:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah ha. He twice came near to marrying her. In 1028 he was summoned by the emperor - to marry one of the princesses, TBC - and the nobles sank the idea. In 1042, after her second husband had died, Zoe offered him a second chance to become emperor, which he effectively turned down with his haughty demeanour. Hence, in the lead, "he came close to ascending the imperial throne by marriage to the porphyrogenita Empress Zoe (r. 1028–1050) in 1028" and "in 1042, Zoe invited Dalassenos to an audience with a view to marrying him and making him emperor; displeased by his haughty manner she chose a more pliant man". Similarly expanded in the article - but with a lot of text in between. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oi, these Greeks! as bad as the Romans and the Habsburgs. I clarified a couple more spots, otherwise, it's great.  auntieruth (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neyutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: