Talk:Constantine Diogenes/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 06:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

About time we got round to one of your historical namesakes... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Indeed :). Pity there isn't more to go on, this will be one of my shortest GAs... Thanks for taking the time, and looking forward to the review. Constantine  ✍  15:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Toolbox checks -- no dab/EL issues.

Prose/structure/content -- no issues remaining AFAIC but pls let me know if any probs with my copyedit.

Images -- licensing looks good.

Referencing -- reliably/formatting looks good.

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Ian and thanks for your edits. They look fine to me and have definitely improved the prose. Any further comments, or suggestions above and beyond GA requirements? Constantine  ✍  09:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Despite the article's brevity, I didn't find myself asking questions or particularly wishing for more, perhaps because the narrative flowed quite naturally from his early career to his death, and as someone who sometimes struggles to get detailed articles out subjects that only date back to World War II, I'm appreciative that we even have this much info on Mr Diogenes... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * OK then, thanks a lot again! Best, Constantine  ✍  10:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)