Talk:Constituent Assembly (Philippines)

pangit...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.144.119.38 (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

A fourth way to amend the Constitution?
Since the Phil Constitution is based upon the American, why can't the Phil Constitution be amended like the US Constitution is, without calling a convention or an assembly, or by an initiative, but rather as if it is a regular bill? There is nothing in the Constitution to forbid the "American way", so to speak. --Bruce Hall (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Again, the phrase "Constituent Assembly" is not in the Philippine Constitution. There should be some discussion about how this idea that Congress should meet in a ConAss came about. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Merge with Constitutional reform in the Philippines
Do we need four separate articles? Maybe we should combine People's Initiative, Constitutional Convention (Philippines), and Constituent Assembly (Philippines), into Constitutional reform in the Philippines. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constituent Assembly (Philippines). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090606075342/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090604-208690/Con-ass-sparks-outrage to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090604-208690/Con-ass-sparks-outrage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)