Talk:Constitution Party of Alabama

.
I don't know whether the person suggesting deletion of these sites is a Libertarian or not, but it does strike me as interesting that the Constitution Party state sites are quite substantial compared to the state Libertarian party sites. For example, the Minnesota Constitution Party site has lists of those who were on the ballot and a short list of those elected yet is on the chopping block. The Minneosta Libertarian Party site has nothing, yet is not challenged at all for deletion. IF this person is Libertarian as suggested by other writers, then it stinks of a political hit. I have not personally reviewed any evidence on that person, but it seems like the Libertarian sites would be much more ripe for "picking" if we're really interested in deleting entries that have no value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitsj2 (talk • contribs)
 * I'm certainly open to an AFD for any article that merits it, whether it is about political party or underwater basketweaving.  Suggest you read WP:AGF before wondering about other editors' motives. If you think some Libertarian article merits deletion, there's a process you can follow to propose that. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep I'm a libertarian commando seeking out the state pages of other parties to get rid of them. In fact I'm so good at it, that I practiced by trying to get rid of Libertarian Party of California. [/Sarc]


 * I can't recall how I got involved with these articles, but I've been involved for a while and taken one to AfD at the moment. I'm certainly no Libertarian either and would be just as happy to take any similar articles to AfD. Dougweller (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)