Talk:Constitutional Council (France)

Oath of office of the President
According to, the President of the Republic does not pronounce any oath during the Inauguration Ceremony.

Automated peer review
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
 * The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?] 4
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?] n 1995,n 1999,n 2005; null
 * You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
 * (struck: possible "weasel words" that weren't, because context is clear)
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

Coat of arms is absolutly not official !!!...
I am a french lawyer and historian... (sorry for my bad english).

France have no official "coat of arms" (because in a "République", cannot be existing official "coat of arms"... So this one have nothing else to do on this page !... The "Conseil Constitutionnel" have a logo*, better adding it on the page than that fantasy picture !...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/5/59/Logo_Conseil_Constitutionnel_France.gif

Most republic have. And well there's one, it's just not official. Many governement logos are "not official" as far as I remember the rooster is used a symbol but is not defined as "official symbol". Anyway, yes council's logo sounds a better idea.

--Joujyuze (talk) 19:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Confusing Wording
There is a part that reads "French courts when then prohibited from making rulings of a general nature." which means absolutely nothing, instead of whatever it is trying to say. I do not have the knowledge required to fix this typo, so I am hoping someone who does will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.244.156 (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

NS
Nicolas Sarkozy is life member even if he doesn't want to be (cf talk in french article).


 * Wow. Oops.  No kidding.  That's interesting.  Why don't you put a link to it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.197.239.119 (talk) 07:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

The council doesn't declare a law in contravention of treaties
In 1975, the Constitutional Council said in a decision that " It is [...] not for the Constitutional Council, when a referral is made to it under Article 61 of the Constitution, to consider the consistency of a statute with the provisions of a treaty or an international agreement; "

However, the article says the contrary in the " Powers and tasks " category.

This control is made by administrative (since 1975, 'Jacques Vabre' decision by the Cour de Cassation) and judiciary courts (since 1989, 'Nicolo' decision by the Conseil d'État).

I'm french, sorry for my english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubber.11 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Good article nomiation v2
Hello, this article was extremelly precise, it had literally not one inaccuracy, I did not spot any spelling mistake, it was well organised, it had pictures. Sources, it features IPA etc.....it's fine. Almost everything is explained, complete. It's much more neutral than most of french wikipedia articles about France.

I find it to be more than a "good article". I would say it's one of the best articles I read on wikipedia. And prolly the best english speaking article about anything french, and is better than most of those. It is much better than its french counterpart. And it's all neutral. And does not align with official version, and has an encyclopedic style. It's a beautiful article. It also gives everything and more than what you'd find from any official source at once.

So, it should be reviewed as good article.

Thanks for all.

--Joujyuze (talk) 19:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

How are proceedings conducted?
What cases are (not) accepted? Who can argue in front of the Conseil? Etc. Ds77 (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)