Talk:Constitutional amendment

India (104th amendment)
This edit caught my eye. I have not reverted it, but in light of XX(368)(2) here, I'm wondering about presidential assent. It seems to me that, as it mentions nothing about that assent, the source cited is not sufficient to support an assertion that the constitution has been amended. Is this edit premature? Is a better or an additional supporting source needed? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Constitutional reform in the Philippines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Creative Arts
My classmates — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.216.64 (talk) 03:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)