Talk:Construction History Society

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is notable in itself and for its journal which meets the criteria for notability applying to academic journals of being abstracted and indexed in selective databases. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I realize that this article does not fall under the criteria for speedy deletion, but I do think it lacks notability. If the academic journal is notable, then that may justify its own page - it does not make the CHS notable by relation. Per WP:ORG, "No company or organization is considered inherently notable," and "An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it." This article therefore needs some secondary articles showing that it is indeed notable. --Iamozy (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)