Talk:Contact (1997 American film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I have reviewed this article for GA. I copy edited the article for consistency, such as always calling the main character by her last name, and also corrected some MoS errors. Please feel free to correct any mistakes I have made. In my opinion, this article fulfills the criteria for GA. &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 23:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Yes  b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): It is well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable  c (OR): There is no OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Covers the major aspects of the film b (focused): Remains focused on the article subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations. An interesting article on an interesting film.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations. An interesting article on an interesting film.
 * Congratulations. An interesting article on an interesting film.
 * Congratulations. An interesting article on an interesting film.

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 23:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing. Wildroot (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)