Talk:Contraindication

Encyclopedic voice lost?
Why the change from an encyclopedic voice to the direct quote from page 70 of http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06-545.pdf ? I understand the need to cite sources and have references, but this information could have been inserted without completely overwriting the work of previous Wikipedians. BonsaiViking 18:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

POV
An article should never claim that something should or should not occur. This is obvious bias.

"baby with a fever should never be given aspirin because of the risk of Reye's syndrome, and a person with an anaphylactic food allergy should never eat that food" etc needs to be reworked to reflect what the sources claim, by quoting them, or mentioning thier claims, not by directly adopting their position. 219.73.89.163 (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

An objective editor of WP should never say things like "should never" if they are interested in an unbiased WP...12:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.100.60 (talk)

General contraindication
Then what is general contraindication? 2407:C00:6004:8DC3:1841:9E12:98BA:4731 (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)