Talk:Control (Janet Jackson album)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

-- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * All issues have been addressed I believe. The Bookkeeper   (of the Occult)  06:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You did, though, there a couple more. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed the citations. As for putting (RIAA) directly after "Recording Industry Association of America" - I don't find it very significant - I've written and seen FA articles that don't bother. I think it would simply make it seem more cluttered. The Bookkeeper   (of the Occult)  03:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * True, but would you want to follow that style? I know I wouldn't. Besides, not everyone is familiar with music related info., that's why I said that maybe adding the acronym after the name would help, per here, that particular reader. A good example of this is the "4 Minutes" song article, which recently passed FA. Overall, this is a good article, and has a big chance of being an FA. I won't hold it against you, maybe they will. Anyways, thank you to Bookkeeperoftheoccult for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I guess I had overlooked MOS, I didn't realize it was an official policy. I still think its clutter personally, but I've changed it to comply. Thanks! The Bookkeeper   (of the Occult)  21:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)