Talk:Control table

Examples too detailed
The examples in this article seem to be too detailed. Please note that "Wikipedia is not a textbook"; articles should be written in clear but succint "encyclopedic" style rather than "pedagogical" style.

I have to agree completely with this assessment. The article should address What not How. The (historical) assembly language examples, in particular, are completely over the top. Could the author perhaps place them in an article outside Wikipedia and make a reference to that? Airsplit (talk) 08:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * There is nothing "historical" about Assembler language and the example in the article is just as valid for Z/Architecture (as stated). Since the techniques are not well known, the detail is required to demonstrate its value I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.5.57 (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Control table. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090824073244/http://pplab.snu.ac.kr/courses/adv_pl05/papers/p261-knuth.pdf to http://pplab.snu.ac.kr/courses/adv_pl05/papers/p261-knuth.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)