Talk:Controlled market

Merger?
support Controlled Market is a discussion of a logical sub-set of the concept of market, it and its corrolary free market should really be in the same article discussing markets generally. A whole article to itself is undue prominence.--Red Deathy 13:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. How are you going to link articles that mention controlled market to free market? That doesn't make sense. Improper Bostonian 13:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not suggesting we merge it with free market but with market, the concept without the adjectives - both controlled and free are logical subsets of markets--Red Deathy 13:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Come on. I know why you're wanting to get rid of this article. Let's not play games. Improper Bostonian 13:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I want rid of it because there isn't enough to substantiate a full article, the topic doesn't have legs, seperate articles on price controls and economic planning exist. Until you got here this article didn't exis, and was just a redirect.--Red Deathy 13:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure. There's plenty to substantiate a full article. I'll be adding more material. Improper Bostonian 13:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you're reading something that's not here - part of my objkection to linking in capitalism to the free market article is that i think it oughtn't to exist and the subject should be dealt with more fully in a consolidated market (which at the moment is a poor artcle).--Red Deathy 13:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You think the free market article shouldn't exist either? That's crazy. Improper Bostonian 13:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Just as Flammable and non-flammable both belong in the same article, so too shjould free and controlled markets, in a full discussion of market - you'll see i've proposed a similar merger over at free market...--Red Deathy 14:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)